Wicked problems, policy and politics

Why New Zealand needs a more consensual approach

New Zealand faces a growing list of complex challenges. Climate change, youth offending, inequality, energy security and the future of superannuation all fit the definition of “wicked problems.” They involve many interconnected causes and cannot be resolved by one action or within a single government term.

In a new commentary, Wicked Problems, Policy and Politics: Towards more consensual policy-making, Koi Tū Centre for Informed Futures Director Sir Peter Gluckman outlines why progress has been so difficult.

Read the commentary

He argues that New Zealand’s adversarial political culture and short electoral cycles limit the ability to plan and act for the long term. Although MMP was created to encourage cooperation, today’s social media-driven, attention-led environment often rewards extremes rather than consensus.

Addressing wicked problems requires steady commitment over time. It also requires political parties and the public to share a common understanding of the issues and the trade-offs involved.

This means drawing on strong evidence, acknowledging complexity and communicating openly about consequences. “Politicians need to be more honest about the issues, the trade-offs and the path ahead,” Sir Peter writes. “Transformation is only possible when it is built on consensus.”

Wicked Problems, Policy and Politics: highlights lessons from countries such as Finland, Switzerland and Singapore, where long-range thinking and public-facing analysis help societies work toward common goals.

Koi Tū argues that New Zealand must adopt a more open and evidence-informed policy process so progress can continue regardless of election cycles.